BERNARD LEWIS - NOTAS DE "LOS ÁRABES EN LA HISTORIA DE LA CIVILIZACIÓN"

 El término árabe aún se utiliza coloquialmente en Egipto e Irak para distinguir a los beduinos de los desiertos circundantes de los campesinos nativos de los grandes valles fluviales.

NOTES FROM “ARABS IN THE HISTORY OF CIVILIZATION” - BERNARD LEWIS

 The term Arab is still used colloquially in Egypt and Iraq to distinguish the Bedouin of the surrounding deserts from the native peasants of the great river valleys.


That the Arabs themselves may have used the word from time immemorial to distinguish the Bedouin from the Arabic-speaking townspeople and peasants, and still use it today, confirms the connection with nomadism.

For Muhammad and his contemporaries, the Arabs were desert Bedouins. In the Qur'an, the term is used only in this sense and never in reference to the people of Mecca and Medina and other urban areas.

In many western chronicles of the Crusader period, the word is used only for the Bedouins, while the Muslim populations of the Near East are called “Saracens”. The 16th century Arab historian Ibn Khaldun also frequently uses the word Arab in this sense.

In summary, the term Arab first appears in the 9th century BC and is used to describe the Bedouins of the desert of Northern Arabia.

Here and there, settled nomads established cities at a slightly more advanced level of society. The most important of these was Mecca in the Hejaz, where each clan still had its own assembly and idol, but the unity of the clans that made up the city was expressed by the gathering of idols in a central sacred place containing a common symbol. The four-cornered building known as the Kaaba was the symbol of this unity in Mecca.

The collection and recording of hadiths took place two or three generations after the Prophet's death. Over the course of more than a hundred years, both the possibilities and the reasons for changing the hadith increased.

The way the Torah stories are told in the Qur'an suggests that Muhammad acquired his knowledge of the Torah through mediation, possibly from Jewish and Christian traders and travelers who had been influenced by the religion of Mithra and pseudo-Christian writers.

The Jews, who were mainly engaged in agriculture and craftsmanship, were economically and culturally superior to the Arabs and therefore disliked.

The Medinans had invited Muhammad, not as a messenger of God, but as a man who would serve them as an arbitrator and have the power to settle their internal disputes.

Muhammad expected a friendly reception from the Jews; he thought that because of their belief in a monotheistic religion, they would accept Islam with a great deal of sympathy and understanding. To placate them, he adopted a few Jewish customs, such as the Kippur fast and praying in the direction of Jerusalem. ... When he realized that he could not gain their support, he abandoned these customs and changed the qiblah from Jerusalem to Mecca.

Strangers to the concept of political sovereignty, the Arabs could only establish a state with the help of religion.

The fact that the Messenger of Allah directed the believers to march against merchant caravans was criticized by European writers. However, according to the conditions of the time and the Arabs' sense of morality, raiding caravans was a natural and legitimate business.

The verses in Medina are different from those in Mecca; they deal with state administration, distribution of booty, etc.

The death of Muhammad threw the young Islamic community into an administrative crisis. The crisis was overcome by the decisive attitude and actions of Abu Bakr, Omar and Abu Ubaydah. These three, in a kind of coup d'état, established Abu Bakr as the sole successor of the Prophet.

By the time of Omar, apart from a small religious tax imposed on Muslims, all taxes, including jizya and tribute, were imposed on the non-Muslim subjects of the empire.

The identification of Islam with Arab nationalism is evident in the way the Arabs themselves treated the new believers. The idea of non-Arabs becoming Muslims was so unexpected that converts were considered believers only when they became mawla of one of the Arab tribes. In theory, the mawali had equal rights with Arabs and were exempt from some taxes, but in practice the Arabs treated them with superiority and contempt and kept them away from the material benefits of Islam for a long time.

After Caliph Omar was assassinated by a slave on November 4, 644, Osman B. Affan was elected caliph in his place. Osman was known for his impotence and cowardice, which was a terrible flaw in the eyes of the Arabs.

Osman's succession as caliph was seen as an achievement of the oligarchic class of Mecca. ... Osman's administrative weakness and favoritism towards his relatives caused unrest among the soldiers on the frontiers.

The ringleaders of the secret plots against Osman's life included the Meccans Talha and Zubayr, Amr, who had been deposed as governor of Egypt, and Aisha, the widow of Muhammad.

On June 17, 656, Osman was assassinated and Ali was installed as caliph. In October 656, at the head of his army, Ali fought the army of Aisha, Talha and Zubayr. It was the first time in history that a Muslim army was led and fought by the caliph himself against another Muslim army.

In January 661, Ali was assassinated by a Kharijite named Ibn Muljam. His son Hasan abandoned the struggle and handed over all his rights to Mu'awiya.

The Umayyads, chiefs of an invading tribe whose style of governance depended on the desert element, built their palaces on the desert frontier where they felt safe.

The Byzantine historian Theophanes refers to Mu'awiya not as a king or emperor, but as a protosymboulos (first consul).

Under Mu'awiya, the Umayyad caliphate manifested itself more as a successor to the Sassanid and Byzantine caliphates than as an Arabist one, maintaining their administrative organization and officials unchanged. Mu'awiya himself used a Syrian Christian scribe.

Those who were not Arabs but had converted to Islam, and those who were Arabs by language or origin but for some reason had lost their membership in the ruling class or had not been able to acquire this right, constituted the Mawali (singular Mawla). Although theoretically they had equal rights with Arabs, there was no such equality in the social and economic spheres. In fact, it was considered very strange for a Mawla to marry an Arab girl.

Shiism was an opposition, expressed in religious terms, to the state and the established order, which had adopted Sunni doctrine.

From the beginning, the economy of the Islamic empire was based on two currencies: The Persian silver dirham was used in the eastern provinces, and the Byzantine gold dinar (denarus) was used in the western provinces.

The empire's non-Muslim population, the Dhimmis, were second-class citizens; they paid higher taxes and were deprived of certain social rights. At times they were the victims of blatant injustice.

In 945, the Iranian Büveyhids, who had gained independence in western Iran, invaded Bagdad and swept away the last traces of the caliph's authority. From then on, the fate of the caliphs remained in the hands of court ministers, mostly Persian and Turkic, who ruled through their retinue of troops.

The early caliphs were hesitant about raids by sea. Caliph 'Omar forbade his commanders to go to places they could not reach by camel.

In 649, Caliph Osman reluctantly authorized Mu'awiya's expedition against Cyprus.

Under Caliph Hisham (976-1009), the term “slavs” was used for slaves of Eastern European origin; later it came to refer to all European slaves in the service of the Andalusian Umayyads.

Arab civilization was not brought ready-made by the invading Arabs coming out of the desert; it emerged after the conquests with the participation of Arab, Persian, Egyptian and many other peoples. Despite its Islamic stamp, its creators included many Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians.

Baybars, a Kipchak Turk, united Syria and Egypt into one state.

When Napoleon occupied Egypt at the beginning of the 19th century, he tried to appoint Arabic-speaking Egyptians to high positions but failed. In the end he had to resort to the Turks, who knew how to make them obey him.

Under the Ottomans, ambitious individuals, many of them Turkish governors, launched independence movements whenever they could.

Yorumlar